In The Manchurian Candidate based on the novel by Richard Condon "put brainwashing front and center" by featuring a plot by the Soviet government to take over the United States by use of a brainwashed presidential candidate. Yen Lo, of the Pavlov Institute. The fear of mind control is equally as powerful an image. See also Sidney Gottlieb.
What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains Steven Pinker is too quick to dismiss people's concerns over the Internet's influence on their intellectual lives.
He asserts that digital media "are the only things that will keep us smart. On neuroplasticity, Pinker expresses the skepticism characteristic of evolutionary psychology advocates. When faced with suggestions that "experience can change the brain," he writes, "cognitive neuroscientists roll their eyes.
He may disagree with these views, but to pretend they don't exist is misleading. In considering "intelligence," Pinker paints with too broad a brush. He writes that "if electronic media were hazardous to intelligence, the quality of science would be plummeting.
Electronic media may enhance some aspects of intelligence the ability to spot patterns, for example, or to collaborate at a distance while at the same time eroding others the ability to reflect on our experiences, say, or to express ourselves in subtle language.
Intelligence can't be gauged by a single measure. Pinker notes that IQ scores rose during the decades of TVs and transistor radios. But that rise, which began in the early s, is largely attributable to gains in visual acuity and abstract problem-solving.
Measures of other components of intelligence, including verbal skill, vocabulary, basic arithmetic, memorization, critical reading, and general knowledge, have been stagnant or declining. Pinker argues that "the effects of experience are highly specific to the experiences themselves.
Given that the average American now spends 8. Pinker is right that "genuine multitasking" is a myth. But that's why many experts on multitasking are concerned about its increasing prevalence. People may think, as they juggle emails, texts, tweets, and glances at websites, that they're adeptly doing a lot of stuff at once, but actually they're switching constantly between different tasks, and suffering the accompanying cognitive costs.
The fact that people who fiddle with cell phones drive poorly shouldn't make us less concerned about the cognitive effects of media distractions; it should make us more concerned.
We should celebrate the benefits that the Net and related media have brought us. I've enjoyed those benefits myself over the last two decades. But we shouldn't be complacent when it comes to the Net's ill effects. As Patricia Greenfield, the UCLA developmental psychologist, wrote in a Science article last year, research suggests that our growing use of screen-based media is weakening our "higher-order cognitive processes," including "abstract vocabulary, mindfulness, reflection, inductive problem solving, critical thinking, and imagination.
How the World Became a Corporation and How to Take It Back The main value in Pinker's statement is the implied notion that media technologies cannot be evaluated in a vacuum.
Taken alone, neither a Twitter account nor a Facebook profile will diminish one's capacity to think or interact. But nothing ever happens alone. These media are arising in contexts of business, economics, and other social factors. No one — or at least no one smart — is saying that PowerPoint reduces discourse to bullet points.
What they are saying is that combined with the bias of the workplace for tangible metrics and easy slogans over long-term planning and complex solutions, the bias PowerPoint toward bullet points can exacerbate the worst existing tendencies in business. It turns out that PowerPoint is not the best tool for every purpose.
So while it would be incorrect to blame PowerPoint for the collapse of competency in America, or the continuing fall of corporate profits over assets, a re-evaluation of the program's universal application in all contexts is overdue.
Likewise, Facebook — as a way for college kids to meet and greet one another — was a terrific program. As a mirror through which young people forge an identity, however, the program is lacking the nuance of real life.
Facebook — more than a program to be feared for its code — is a business plan to be feared for its ubiquity.
The object of Facebook is to monetize social interactions.In the article, “Mind Over Mass Media”, published in in The New York Times, Steven Pinker, a Psychology professor at Harvard, discusses how new technologies can impact our brain.
Rhetorical Analysis about “Mind Over Mass Media” Response #3 Rhetorical Analysis. Purpose: A Rhetorical Analysis is a detailed examination of how persuasive a piece of writing is (or isn’t) and why.
“Mind over Mass Media” Technology of the 21st century has increased and improved so much over the years. The internet launched in and brought the world a juice box of unlimited. Mass Media Summary Essay Mass Media Summary and over other 29,+ free term papers, essays and research papers examples are available on the website!
Autor: ilovepancakes • March 12, • Essay • Words (4 Pages) • 7, Views4/4(1). E. MICHAEL JONES, AUTHOR AND HISTORIAN, is a former professor at Saint Mary’s College in Indiana and the current publisher of Culture Wars Magazine. As the author of several books, Jones’ later works focus on Jewish opposition to the Catholic Church throughout history and its pernicious effect.
As with any type of "addicting" media, one needs self control, "Mind Over Mass Media" as the title of the article suggests. Internet is good in moderation, as long as it does not become a compulsion and affect the daily life of someone, it can be perfectly healthy to use the Internet.